Something is amiss. Or rather, something has happened to the people of this country. It seems that too many voters, inexplicably (or maybe it can be explained but we refuse to believe it because it is too scary), have been swept off of their feet by Donald Trump. The presumptive Republican nominee is a man who knows no shame, decency or respect.
The list is endless -- a long history of sleights, insults, and demagoguery. A trickster who inherited his wealth, but somehow persuaded the public into believing that he was self-made, will be a serious contender for the white house in the general election. Even now, while writing this post, I cannot believe that he is in the lead. His opponents, just recently, are trying to employ the same juvenile tactics that he has used since the beginning of his campaign, i.e. name-calling, innuendo, and conspiracy theories.
An inquiry into how one major political party was hijacked is the subject matter of this post. Serious in tone, markedly different than my more light-hearted blogs, shows how grave I believe our political situation to be. Let us begin.
Beware of what you wish for. Pick any metaphor: Frankenstein, Terminator, or Icarus. Credit for creating Donald Trump the candidate belongs, in part, to the Republican party. For years now, since President Obama was sworn in, the GOP has made it a legislative, political and idealistic goal to oppose everything that the President stands for. It doesn't matter if the party use to adopt a similar policy in the past (see: Cap and Trade, Individual Mandate, Comprehensive Tax Reform). If Obama is for it, they must be against it.
A strategy of obstruction was meant to bear political fruit. Mitch McConnell, senate majority leader, believed that the gridlock would result in voters being frustrated. He knew that Congress would be blamed, but theorized that President Obama would be blamed more. Thus, inaction has become the norm.
In addition, Republicans have stepped up their bluster, hyperbole, and extremism. For purposes of inciting the base, and encouraging higher voter turnout, elected officials have swayed from the mainstream. Instead of "a president whom we disagree with", it has become normal to say that the "president is a traitor, terrorist-funding, dictator, who will do anything to dismantle the constitution." Such language riles the passions, particularly those who hold white nationalist beliefs (a core constituency of Donald Trump).
GOP primary voters are mad. They are angry with their economic station in life. For decades now, income and wealth inequality has benefited those at the top at the expense of everyone else. It is being felt everyday. Trade deficits result in layoffs. Soaring corporate profits culminate in lower wages. Beneficial tax rates for millionaires and billionaires lead to reduced tax receipts and social benefits. Who has advocated for the policies that exacerbate the problems above? Republicans.
Add it all up: an angry, frustrated populist movement exists in the Republican party and Donald Trump knows how to play into their anger. He offers easy solutions. The real estate mogul dumbs it down. Trump makes life a zero-sum game: it has to be the fault of undocumented immigrants (economists actually point out that immigrants increase innovation and GDP), or Muslims, or African-Americans. Complexity is shunned. Quick, streamlined justice according to "The Donald", and "The Donald" alone, is all that is needed for "America to be great again."
Donald Trump will likely be the general election candidate for the Republicans, and a large establishment majority within the party do not like it. They believed, incorrectly, that they could control the extreme elements within. Political death after political death should have been a warning (Dick Lugar, Eric Cantor, John Boehner); it wasn't. The monster movement that the GOP created is uncontrollable and strikes indiscriminately.
Pundits, establishment politicians, and wealthy insiders may be confused about the current state of affairs. Perhaps, they really didn't see a Donald Trump victory on the horizon. But any fan of science fiction knows, you have to be careful with what you create. Ultimately, your own creation can be your own demise.
Showing posts with label Presidential Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Presidential Election. Show all posts
Monday, February 29, 2016
Sunday, January 31, 2016
Bernie Already Won
American presidential elections are unlike any other in the world. For one, presidential campaigns start way too early -- years before a voter steps into the voting box. Two, billions of dollars are spent on the candidates. Thank you Citizens United (not really). Three, we have a primary system that puts an inordinate amount of responsibility on a Midwest state that does not reflect the broader electorate.
Tomorrow, February 1, the voting will begin. The state of Iowa will caucus and choose a candidate for the general election. Polls show a close race on both sides of the aisle. Donald Trump leads Senator Ted Cruz; Secretary Hillary Clinton edges Senator Bernie Sanders by a few points. Only time will tell who will end the night victorious.
For Democrats, even if Hillary were to win, Bernie Sanders will remain the champion. This observation is not meant as a dig to Secretary Clinton, who remains a strong, formidable progressive. No, it is a reflection on what has occurred during the summer and fall. Feel the Bern has become a movement that will not be extinguished with a loss in Iowa. A fire has been lit.
The popularity of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders lies in current economic realities. For the past four decades, income and wealth distribution has grown more unfair. By objective measures, America no longer offers equal opportunity for those willing to work towards their American Dream. Instead, corporate profits soar while wages remain flat. Executives receive a 300:1 pay ratio without having to deliver results.
Levels of inequality are obscene. Even conservatives cannot deny it. 100 White Americans own more wealth than every African-American throughout the country. One family, the Walton family, has more wealth than 40% of the entire country. Since 1979, the percentage of national income to the top 1% has doubled. Japanese, Italians, and Belgians are more wealthy than Americans.
With so much wealth, the privileged class has sole influence over our elected officials. Political scientists have done the research. Important issues to average Americans are not on the radar for representatives. Instead, lobbyists and campaign contributions make sure that corporate interests are catered to first, and usually to the detriment of the consumer. Monopolies run rampant; small businesses and entrepreneurship have declined. We do not have a capitalist system. We have a crony state.
Bernie Sanders has run his campaign on the promise to raise the middle class up rather than subjugate it to Wall Street. Labels do not matter, even if the media claims that his democratic-socialist identification will hurt his chances of a win in a general election. What ultimately matters is how this economic crisis will be solved. Americans, particularly millennials, who comprise a large percentage of his passionate supporters, know that if action is not taken together, collectively, we will slide into more unrest, bitter partisanship, and economic stagnation.
Republicans and Democrats feel the injustice. So, going forward, no matter the outcome of the Iowa Caucus, issues of economic fairness will be front and center. In a way, Bernie has already won.
Tomorrow, February 1, the voting will begin. The state of Iowa will caucus and choose a candidate for the general election. Polls show a close race on both sides of the aisle. Donald Trump leads Senator Ted Cruz; Secretary Hillary Clinton edges Senator Bernie Sanders by a few points. Only time will tell who will end the night victorious.
For Democrats, even if Hillary were to win, Bernie Sanders will remain the champion. This observation is not meant as a dig to Secretary Clinton, who remains a strong, formidable progressive. No, it is a reflection on what has occurred during the summer and fall. Feel the Bern has become a movement that will not be extinguished with a loss in Iowa. A fire has been lit.
The popularity of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders lies in current economic realities. For the past four decades, income and wealth distribution has grown more unfair. By objective measures, America no longer offers equal opportunity for those willing to work towards their American Dream. Instead, corporate profits soar while wages remain flat. Executives receive a 300:1 pay ratio without having to deliver results.
Levels of inequality are obscene. Even conservatives cannot deny it. 100 White Americans own more wealth than every African-American throughout the country. One family, the Walton family, has more wealth than 40% of the entire country. Since 1979, the percentage of national income to the top 1% has doubled. Japanese, Italians, and Belgians are more wealthy than Americans.
With so much wealth, the privileged class has sole influence over our elected officials. Political scientists have done the research. Important issues to average Americans are not on the radar for representatives. Instead, lobbyists and campaign contributions make sure that corporate interests are catered to first, and usually to the detriment of the consumer. Monopolies run rampant; small businesses and entrepreneurship have declined. We do not have a capitalist system. We have a crony state.
Bernie Sanders has run his campaign on the promise to raise the middle class up rather than subjugate it to Wall Street. Labels do not matter, even if the media claims that his democratic-socialist identification will hurt his chances of a win in a general election. What ultimately matters is how this economic crisis will be solved. Americans, particularly millennials, who comprise a large percentage of his passionate supporters, know that if action is not taken together, collectively, we will slide into more unrest, bitter partisanship, and economic stagnation.
Republicans and Democrats feel the injustice. So, going forward, no matter the outcome of the Iowa Caucus, issues of economic fairness will be front and center. In a way, Bernie has already won.
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Hey Media: Do Your Jobs
Senator Ted Cruz was right during the CNBC debate in Boulder, Colorado. I, along with most people, do not like the media. But, Mr. Cruz's rationale was wrong. The debate moderators were not being biased or unfair, they were being too timid. Indeed, the whole media has let GOP candidates get away with falsehood after falsehood. When will they begin to do their job?
Watching the debate, without access to independent sources and facts, a viewer could conclude that the questions were prejudiced. Almost every speaker attacked the questioner, the debate, or the network that hosted the debate. The candidates exhibited emotions of denial or outright contempt when pressed. Republican voters ate it up; the pugnaciousness fed into the narrative that there is only one trustworthy network on television nowadays.
The problem: the country we live in does not lack access to the facts. Donald Trump denied having disagreed with Mark Zuckerberg on immigration visas. Anyone could have visited Trump's own website to find out that it was not true. Only a few fact-checker websites ran with the story.
Same for Tea Party favorite Ben Carson, whose mild manner allegedly shows a contrast to Trump despite them sharing similar, bizarre views. When asked why he would affiliate himself with a company that falsely advertised cures for autism and cancer, he responded that it was total propaganda. The gall on him. Mr. Carson was paid to give speeches and praise their products. He did have some "ties" to the company. When will a "journalist" follow-up with him on his false assertions?
Winner of the debate, Senator Marco Rubio, had one of the best applause lines of the debate. He declared that the entire media was a Super PAC for the Democrats. However, he could not defend his own tax proposal without misleading. John Hardwood, one of the moderators, asked why his plan would result in a greater tax reduction for the top 1%, rather than the middle class. Mr. Rubio demurred. First, he said it wasn't true -- even though it was, as scored by a conservative think tank. Then, he said something unrelated to the content of the question. After the debate, the media declared him the winner, although the middle class would be the losers if he were to win. No one seemed to care about that.
Where does one begin with Carly Fiorina, who was somewhat called out for refusing to acknowledge that she lied about a planned parenthood video at the last debate. She recycled a discredited line at the most recent debate -- there was not a disproportionate amount of job losses for women under President Obama. Yet, she still campaigns as if it makes no difference what she says or does not say.
Simply put, the media is horrible. There must have been a time in our polarized society when the media decided that it was better to appear unbiased at the expense of the truth. The bottom-line was to be protected even it meant taking it easy on the politicians who wantonly lie.
A democratic society depends on a vigorous free press. I fear that we have lost ours. The public should not have to search for the truth like Indiana Jones in a dark, insect-infested tomb. Presidential candidates must be scrutinized. The office holds too much power. If a presidential candidate believes, sincerely believes, that he or she can get elected by willfully misleading, then what will he or she do once in office. Hey media, you better do your damn jobs.
Watching the debate, without access to independent sources and facts, a viewer could conclude that the questions were prejudiced. Almost every speaker attacked the questioner, the debate, or the network that hosted the debate. The candidates exhibited emotions of denial or outright contempt when pressed. Republican voters ate it up; the pugnaciousness fed into the narrative that there is only one trustworthy network on television nowadays.
The problem: the country we live in does not lack access to the facts. Donald Trump denied having disagreed with Mark Zuckerberg on immigration visas. Anyone could have visited Trump's own website to find out that it was not true. Only a few fact-checker websites ran with the story.
Same for Tea Party favorite Ben Carson, whose mild manner allegedly shows a contrast to Trump despite them sharing similar, bizarre views. When asked why he would affiliate himself with a company that falsely advertised cures for autism and cancer, he responded that it was total propaganda. The gall on him. Mr. Carson was paid to give speeches and praise their products. He did have some "ties" to the company. When will a "journalist" follow-up with him on his false assertions?
Winner of the debate, Senator Marco Rubio, had one of the best applause lines of the debate. He declared that the entire media was a Super PAC for the Democrats. However, he could not defend his own tax proposal without misleading. John Hardwood, one of the moderators, asked why his plan would result in a greater tax reduction for the top 1%, rather than the middle class. Mr. Rubio demurred. First, he said it wasn't true -- even though it was, as scored by a conservative think tank. Then, he said something unrelated to the content of the question. After the debate, the media declared him the winner, although the middle class would be the losers if he were to win. No one seemed to care about that.
Where does one begin with Carly Fiorina, who was somewhat called out for refusing to acknowledge that she lied about a planned parenthood video at the last debate. She recycled a discredited line at the most recent debate -- there was not a disproportionate amount of job losses for women under President Obama. Yet, she still campaigns as if it makes no difference what she says or does not say.
Simply put, the media is horrible. There must have been a time in our polarized society when the media decided that it was better to appear unbiased at the expense of the truth. The bottom-line was to be protected even it meant taking it easy on the politicians who wantonly lie.
A democratic society depends on a vigorous free press. I fear that we have lost ours. The public should not have to search for the truth like Indiana Jones in a dark, insect-infested tomb. Presidential candidates must be scrutinized. The office holds too much power. If a presidential candidate believes, sincerely believes, that he or she can get elected by willfully misleading, then what will he or she do once in office. Hey media, you better do your damn jobs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)